[3D Ufficiale] Aspettando Windows Vista SP1

[VIKKO VIKKO]

con il SP! sapete se la velocita nel trasferire file ha raggiunto xp?

[PnP]

Originariamente inviato da VIKKO VIKKO

con il SP! sapete se la velocita nel trasferire file ha raggiunto xp?

lo ha superato... per me per lo meno.. ma anche senza sp ma con li ultimi aggiornamenti di ottobre.. ola

[VIKKO VIKKO]

ottimo

molte cose di sp1 le trovate scritte qui
http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/wi...hitepaper.aspx

[fdm91hu]

la velocità di trasferimento files naturalmente dipenderà dal vostro hard disk! quindi se avete un hard disk di 2 - 3 anni fa, ovviamente non potrete di certo aspettarvi le prestazioni che volete...
in ogni caso il problema è stato in parte risolto già ed in parte verrà risolto con il SP1

Gli aggiornamenti proposti nel SP1 sono essenzialmente di 3 tipi: QUALITY, ADMINISTRATION EXPERIENCE e SUPPORT EMERGING HARDWARE and STANDARDS. Dandoci una lettura rapida, ho trovato alcuni spunti interessanti.

QUALITY

Sono aggiornamenti che migliorano affidabilità, sicurezza e performance. Tra questi:

miglioramento di affidabilità e performance entrando e uscendo dallla modalità SLEEP
migioramento di affidabilità di PC aggiornati da Windows XP
miglioramento di prestazioni per:
copia ed estrazione di file compressi
velocità di con cui si torna dalla modalità Hibernate e Resume
PC membri di dominio quando lavorano "sconnessi" dal dominio (ci sono notevoli "attese" quando di cerca di aprire il File Dialog Box)
Internet Explorer® 7 in Windows Vista (meno consumo di CPU e maggior velocità con JavaScript)
browsing di file di rete migliorato
ADMINISTRATION EXPERIENCE

Sono aggiornamenti che migliorano generalmente il supporto e la gestione di Vista., Tra gli altri, segnalo che BitLocker Drive Encryption permette di cifrare non solo il disco C ma anche i volumi ulteriori presenti sul PC (D, E, F, ecc.)

EMERGING HARDWARE and STANDARDS

Sono aggiornamenti che permettono al sistema di adeguarsi a nuovi (o futuri) standard. Tra gli altri:

Support per exFAT file system (il file system delle future memorie flash)
Secure Socket Tunneling Protocol (SSTP) un protocollo di tunneling che permette di eliminare quei problemi di connessione che si hanno quando, cercando di fare una connessione VPN, non si riescono a superare, causa compatibilità, apparati di rete intermedi come Firewall, Nat o Web Proxy. Se volete approfondire Feliciano ha scritto un POST che con la consueta chiarezza spiega nei dettagli questa funzionalità.
DEPLOYMENT

Come distribuirlo? Sono previste al momento 3 modalità:

Express. scarica dal internet solo i files necessari, circa 50 MB per una singola macchina con architettura x86
Stand-alone. per PC con connettivita' internet limitata, il pacchetto è notevolmente più grande ma il vantaggio è che il singolo package va bene per tutte le versioni di Vista.
Slipstream. Sono i Media di installazione già aggiornati con SP1. Verranno resi disponibili in futuro

[fdm91hu]

ottimo lavoro!
la white page, per chi la volesse scaricare è questa:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en

[Wolfenstein]

scusatemi l'intrusione ma ho installato vista da poche ore, visto che avete quasi tutti questa benedetta service pack 1 beta potete darmi il link cosi la metto pure io!!!!!


GRAZIE

[fdm91hu]

caro
ti ho risposto in pvt!

http://www.blogvista.it/test-in-cors...onte-1591.html

[fdm91hu]

raga a me l'aggiornamento KB-938979 dice che non è applicabile al sistema in uso...
ma è solo per l'Ultimate?

[steo31]

Anche a me dice che non è applicabile al sistema in uso eppure ho windows vista ultimate!!!!

Come mai??

[fdm91hu]

bah!!!

[ugo71]

anche a me ci sono un paio di fix che non vanno forse dipende dalla lingua, almeno per uno la versione italiana è andata bene l'inglese no

[Sensityve]

Why Microsoft must abandon Vista to save itself

(Credit: Microsoft)While Vista was originally touted by Microsoft as the operating system savior we've all been waiting for, it has turned out to be one of the biggest blunders in technology. With a host of issues that are inexcusable and features that are taken from the Mac OS X and Linux playbook, Microsoft has once again lost sight of what we really want.

As we're more than aware, Vista Ultimate comes at a premium. For an additional $160 over the Premium SKU price, Ultimate gives you a complete backup and restore option, BitLocker Drive encryption, the ever so popular Windows Fax & Scan, and the "Ultimate Extras." But what started with a promise of "Extras" by summer, quickly turned into an apology from Microsoft and the eventual release of DreamScene and Windows Hold 'Em (among others) today. And while each of the "Extras" runs just fine, Microsoft's "Extras" blunder is just another reason why the company must abandon Vista before it's too late.

The first indication that Microsoft should abandon Vista is its poor sales figures. According to a recent report titled "Windows Vista Still Underperforming in U.S. Retail" from NPD, Vista sales are significantly behind XP sales during its early days. Even worse for Redmond, some are reverting to XP, citing issues with compatibility and overall design. And if that wasn't enough, Macs continue to surge and with the impending release of Leopard, Microsoft may be in for a rough holiday season.

With each passing day, it's becoming blatantly clear that Microsoft released Vista too early and the company's continual mistakes and promises that can't be kept are further annoying the Windows faithful.

Much talk has been given to Service Pack 1 and how this update should address many of the issues users have with Vista, but I simply don't agree. Will SP1 eliminate the ridiculous Microsoft licensing schemes? Will SP1 drop the price on the higher-end versions? Will SP1 eliminate the need for users to buy a new computer just to use the faulty OS?

SP1 will do nothing but fix the holes and issues we currently know about and create even more. As we all know from the days of Windows ME and even XP, Microsoft is not the best company at finding and addressing security issues, and chances are, Vista will be no different.

One significant problem that I have with Vista is its inclusion of new DRM, specifically the company's decision to install Protected Video Path. To prevent a person from copying (or in most cases, backing up) a movie, the operating system provides process isolation and if an unverified component is in use, the operating system shuts down DRM content. For the first time on any operating system, we're not even allowed to backup our favorite movies? Come on.

I also find it interesting that Microsoft decided to take the user access control concept from Mac OS X and make it much worse. Can someone please explain to me why I need to be asked if I wanted to do something entirely innocuous like open a third-party app from a well-known software company?

Never before have I seen such an abysmal start to an operating system release. For almost a year, people have been adopting Vista and becoming incensed by how poorly it operates. Not only does it cost too much, it requires more to run than XP, there is still poor driver support, and that draconian licensing scheme is a by-product of Microsoft picking on the wrong people.

The road ahead looks dangerous for Vista and Microsoft must realize that. With Mac OS X hot on its tail, Vista is simply not capable of competing at an OS level with some of the best software around. If Microsoft continues down this path, it will be Vista that will bring the software giant to its knees--not Bill Gates' departure.

Of course, categorically dumping an operating system is quite difficult and with millions already using the OS, chances are Microsoft won't find a good enough reason to do it. And while I can understand that argument, there's no reason the company can't continue to support Vista and go back to the drawing board for its next OS. Even better, go back to XP--it's not nearly as bad as Vista.

As a daily user of Mac OS X, Ubuntu and Vista, I'm keenly aware of what works and what doesn't. Mac and Linux work.

The time is up. Microsoft must abandon Vista and move on. It's the company's only chance at redemption.

[fdm91hu]

non penso dipenda dalla lingua poichè l'ho scaricato da microsoft.it...

immagini del service pack
http://cid-261d8fb2a992b4e1.skydrive...%20Screenshots

[ugo71]

Originariamente inviato da Sensityve

Why Microsoft must abandon Vista to save itself

(Credit: Microsoft)While Vista was originally touted by Microsoft as the operating system savior we've all been waiting for, it has turned out to be one of the biggest blunders in technology. With a host of issues that are inexcusable and features that are taken from the Mac OS X and Linux playbook, Microsoft has once again lost sight of what we really want.

As we're more than aware, Vista Ultimate comes at a premium. For an additional $160 over the Premium SKU price, Ultimate gives you a complete backup and restore option, BitLocker Drive encryption, the ever so popular Windows Fax & Scan, and the "Ultimate Extras." But what started with a promise of "Extras" by summer, quickly turned into an apology from Microsoft and the eventual release of DreamScene and Windows Hold 'Em (among others) today. And while each of the "Extras" runs just fine, Microsoft's "Extras" blunder is just another reason why the company must abandon Vista before it's too late.

The first indication that Microsoft should abandon Vista is its poor sales figures. According to a recent report titled "Windows Vista Still Underperforming in U.S. Retail" from NPD, Vista sales are significantly behind XP sales during its early days. Even worse for Redmond, some are reverting to XP, citing issues with compatibility and overall design. And if that wasn't enough, Macs continue to surge and with the impending release of Leopard, Microsoft may be in for a rough holiday season.

With each passing day, it's becoming blatantly clear that Microsoft released Vista too early and the company's continual mistakes and promises that can't be kept are further annoying the Windows faithful.

Much talk has been given to Service Pack 1 and how this update should address many of the issues users have with Vista, but I simply don't agree. Will SP1 eliminate the ridiculous Microsoft licensing schemes? Will SP1 drop the price on the higher-end versions? Will SP1 eliminate the need for users to buy a new computer just to use the faulty OS?

SP1 will do nothing but fix the holes and issues we currently know about and create even more. As we all know from the days of Windows ME and even XP, Microsoft is not the best company at finding and addressing security issues, and chances are, Vista will be no different.

One significant problem that I have with Vista is its inclusion of new DRM, specifically the company's decision to install Protected Video Path. To prevent a person from copying (or in most cases, backing up) a movie, the operating system provides process isolation and if an unverified component is in use, the operating system shuts down DRM content. For the first time on any operating system, we're not even allowed to backup our favorite movies? Come on.

I also find it interesting that Microsoft decided to take the user access control concept from Mac OS X and make it much worse. Can someone please explain to me why I need to be asked if I wanted to do something entirely innocuous like open a third-party app from a well-known software company?

Never before have I seen such an abysmal start to an operating system release. For almost a year, people have been adopting Vista and becoming incensed by how poorly it operates. Not only does it cost too much, it requires more to run than XP, there is still poor driver support, and that draconian licensing scheme is a by-product of Microsoft picking on the wrong people.

The road ahead looks dangerous for Vista and Microsoft must realize that. With Mac OS X hot on its tail, Vista is simply not capable of competing at an OS level with some of the best software around. If Microsoft continues down this path, it will be Vista that will bring the software giant to its knees--not Bill Gates' departure.

Of course, categorically dumping an operating system is quite difficult and with millions already using the OS, chances are Microsoft won't find a good enough reason to do it. And while I can understand that argument, there's no reason the company can't continue to support Vista and go back to the drawing board for its next OS. Even better, go back to XP--it's not nearly as bad as Vista.

As a daily user of Mac OS X, Ubuntu and Vista, I'm keenly aware of what works and what doesn't. Mac and Linux work.

The time is up. Microsoft must abandon Vista and move on. It's the company's only chance at redemption.

quoto

in un certo senso è già così, spesso ho la sensazione che microsoz tenda a non considerare vista come un s.o. in uso ma quasi fosse una beta perenne se non addirittura una demo più d'effetto che di sostanza, temo che il vero obbiettivo di vista fosse, o sia.. , strettamente legato al DRM & co., che venga dismesso è improbabile ma di certo se non faranno dei drastici cambiamenti lasciando perdere, almeno per sta volta DRM etc. la vedo dura..anzi, anche nel miglior caso, sarebbe cmq la peggior figura possibile per il colosso che con s-vista ha deluso veramente a 360°.. che non sia un'os da buttare di per sè è certo il danno più grave per ms

[steo31]

Originariamente inviato da fdm91hu

non penso dipenda dalla lingua poichè l'ho scaricato da microsoft.it...

Adesso provo con quella in inglese!!

Originariamente inviato da ugo71

quoto

in un certo senso è già così, spesso ho la sensazione che microsoz tenda a non considerare vista come un s.o. in uso ma quasi fosse una beta perenne se non addirittura una demo più d'effetto che di sostanza, temo che il vero obbiettivo di vista fosse, o sia.. , strettamente legato al DRM & co., che venga dismesso è improbabile ma di certo se non faranno dei drastici cambiamenti lasciando perdere, almeno per sta volta DRM etc. la vedo dura..anzi, anche nel miglior caso, sarebbe cmq la peggior figura possibile per il colosso che con s-vista ha deluso veramente a 360°.. che non sia un'os da buttare di per sè è certo il danno più grave per ms

Se Vista è da buttare allora Ubuntu cos è? lo smaltimento dei rifiuti? vogliamo parlare di leopard ?? .
Vista è oggi il miglior sistema operativo e col tempo migliorerà ancor di più.